Wonder & Worry
A workbench with an unfinished violin and hand tools

Nine areas

Economic AI, jobs and pay

Work is how most people pay the rent, and also where many find purpose and standing. AI can take over tasks that used to be someone's paid job, especially writing, translation, coding, illustration and routine office work. The same tools can also make a less experienced worker faster and better. Early evidence points both ways. Some freelance markets have shrunk, while broad national data so far show small effects on earnings. Much depends on who receives the gains. If they flow only to the owners of the systems, inequality grows. If contracts, licences and public policy share them, many more people can benefit.

Wonder

Shared prosperity

The time and wealth these tools create are shared, so more people can afford to make things.

  • 11 more hours

    a week of creative work reported by artists in Ireland's basic income pilot than by a lottery control group. Measured

  • €1.39

    returned per euro spent on that pilot, by a government-commissioned cost-benefit estimate. Estimate

  • 15%

    more issues resolved per hour across 5,172 support agents given an AI assistant. Less experienced workers gained most. Measured

  • 40% faster

    and rated 18% better: short writing tasks by professionals randomly given ChatGPT, in an experiment with 453 people. The gap between stronger and weaker writers narrowed. Measured

It takes Policy. No such scheme is yet funded by AI's gains.

Worry

Livelihoods

  • 26% and 36%

    of illustrators and translators who answered a UK survey said they had already lost work to generative AI. Survey

  • 9.4% lower

    monthly earnings for image-related freelancers on Upwork after image generators launched, relative to other freelancers. Measured

  • 24%

    of music creators' revenue is projected to be at risk by 2028, in a study commissioned by a creators' rights body. Forecast

  • 19% lower

    employment of 22 to 25 year olds in the most AI-exposed jobs since late 2022, relative to less-exposed peers. Descriptive, not proof of cause. Measured

  • 21% fewer

    job posts for writing and coding work that AI can easily automate, relative to manual-skill jobs, on one large freelance platform within eight months of ChatGPT's launch. Image-creation posts fell 17% after image generators arrived. Measured

  • 1 in 4

    workers worldwide is in a job with some exposure to generative AI, by an ILO estimate. In high-income countries the most exposed group holds 9.6% of women's jobs and 3.5% of men's. Exposure does not mean the job will be lost. Estimate

  • 54,836

    job cuts announced by US employers in 2025 named AI as the reason, about 4.5% of all announced cuts. These are announced plans tallied by an outplacement firm. Reported

What is being done

A union contract that sets the terms.

Under the Writers Guild of America contract, AI is not a writer, its output does not count as literary or source material, studios cannot require writers to use AI, and studios must disclose AI-generated material they hand over. The 2026 agreement, ratified with 90.38% voting yes and running to May 2030, keeps these rules and adds notice when studios license writers' work for AI training.

For artists and musicians

People still value the human hand.

Across six online experiments with 2,965 people, art was valued less when labelled as AI-made, and human-labelled art seemed more creative when viewed next to AI-labelled work.

Worth knowing

A national study found no effect on pay so far.

A study linking Danish government earnings records to surveys of chatbot use in 11 exposed occupations found no measurable effect on earnings or hours, ruling out effects larger than 2% two years after ChatGPT's launch. It is a working paper, not yet peer reviewed.

Worth knowing

Feeling faster is different from being faster.

In a small randomized trial with early-2025 tools, 16 experienced open-source developers took 19% longer on real tasks while believing AI had made them 20% faster. The same group reported in 2026 that newer tools probably speed developers up, though its follow-up data were too weak to say by how much.

An open question

Will AI's productivity gains show up as higher pay for workers, or mainly as profits and lower prices?

This page does not list everything. Last reviewed October 11, 2026.

Source 4

Society of Authors. AI survey results (n=787, Jan 2024), via European Writers' Council. europeanwriterscouncil.eu/soa-survey-uk-ai-2024/

See all sources

Source 5

Hui X, Reshef O, Zhou L. The Short-Term Effects of Generative AI on Employment. Organization Science 35(6), 2024. doi:10.1287/orsc.2023.18441 (figures from CESifo WP 10601, 2023)

See all sources

Source 6

CISAC / PMP Strategy. Economic impact of generative AI in music and audiovisual. Dec 2024. cisac.org/Newsroom/news-releases/global-economic-study-shows-human-creators-future-risk-generative-ai

See all sources

Source 7

Brynjolfsson E, Chandar B, Chen R. Canaries in the Coal Mine? Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Aug 2026 update. digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/app/uploads/2026/08/Canaries_August2026.pdf

See all sources

Source 71

Demirci O, Hannane J, Zhu X. Who Is AI Replacing? The Impact of Generative AI on Online Freelancing Platforms. Management Science 71(10), 2025. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2024.05420

See all sources

Source 72

Gmyrek P, et al. Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure. ILO Working Paper 140, May 2025. ilo.org/node/706766

See all sources

Source 73

Challenger, Gray & Christmas. 2025 Year-End Challenger Report. 8 Jan 2026. challengergray.com/blog/2025-year-end-challenger-report-highest-q4-layoffs-since-2008-lowest-ytd-hiring-since-2010/

See all sources

Source 43

Department of Culture, Communications and Sport (Ireland). Basic Income for the Arts: two-year report, and Alma Economics cost-benefit analysis. gov.ie, Sep 2025.

See all sources

Source 44

Brynjolfsson E, Li D, Raymond L. Generative AI at Work. Quarterly Journal of Economics 140(2):889-942, 2025. doi:10.1093/qje/qjae044 (staggered rollout, not randomized)

See all sources

Source 74

Noy S, Zhang W. Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381(6654), 2023. doi:10.1126/science.adh2586

See all sources

Source 75

Writers Guild of America. WGA Ratifies 2026 Minimum Basic Agreement with AMPTP. 24 Apr 2026. wga.org/news-events/news/press/wga-ratifies-2026-minimum-basic-agreement-with-amptp ; Artificial Intelligence (Know Your Rights). wga.org/contracts/know-your-rights/artificial-intelligence

See all sources

Source 78

Horton CB Jr, White MW, Iyengar SS. Bias against AI art can enhance perceptions of human creativity. Scientific Reports 13:19001, 2023. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-45202-3

See all sources

Source 76

Humlum A, Vestergaard E. Still Waters, Rapid Currents: Early Labor Market Transformation under Generative AI. NBER Working Paper 33777, 2025 (revised Mar 2026). nber.org/papers/w33777

See all sources

Source 77

METR. Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity. 10 Jul 2025. metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/ ; update of 24 Feb 2026. metr.org/blog/2026-02-24-uplift-update/

See all sources